K-ReaD（ Kokugakuin University Researcher’s Achievement）
| Ryo OGAWA | |
| Department of Law | |
| Lecturer |
Last Updated :2024/07/04
研究者基本情報
氏名
氏名
Ryo OGAWA
ホームページ・researchmap等のリンク
ホームページ・researchmap等のリンク
所属・職名
学位
- Mar. 2018, 修士（法学）, 東京大学, 法学関係, ロナルド・ドゥオーキンの解釈方法論の分析とその擁護
- 19 Mar. 2021, 博士（法学）, 東京大学, 法学関係, 博法第362号, 司法審査の基礎と応用
職歴
- Apr. 2024, 9999, Kokugakuin University, Faculty of Law
- Apr. 2021, 9999
- Apr. 2020, 9999, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies
- Apr. 2022, Mar. 2024, Tokyo Metropolitan University
- Apr. 2022, Mar. 2024, Hosei University
- Apr. 2021, Mar. 2022
- Apr. 2018, Mar. 2021
- Jul. 2015, Mar. 2016
- Jul. 2014, Jul. 2015
- Apr. 2013, Jul. 2014, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications
本学就任年月日
研究活動
論文
- 64, 2, Feb. 2024
- 100, 4, 113, 130, Apr. 2024
- 522, 12, 17, Feb. 2024
- 100, 1, 135, 155, Jan. 2024
- 64, 1, 321, 363, Jul. 2023
- 136, 5・6, 542, 493, Jun. 2023
- 99, 5, 139, 152, May 2023
- 136, 3・4, 350, 285, Apr. 2023
- 63, 2, 337, 374, Feb. 2023
- 136, 1・2, 158, 111, Feb. 2023
- Inference to the Explanation as a Common Method of Philosophy, Ogawa Ryo, Kagaku tetsugaku, 55, 1, 1, 21, 10 Dec. 2022, The Philosophy of Science Society, Japan, In Japan, despite its popularity in natural science and philosophy, Inference to the Best Explanation is generally considered as an argument for scientific realism rather than as a method of philosophy. This paper aims to marshal some relevant topics in dispute and defend IBE against its critics. The distinct feature of IBE is that it considers simplicity and fruitfulness as theoretical virtues. This character makes IBE useful as a common method of philosophical inquiry. In conclusion, IBE is tenable as a heuristic to identify a working hypothesis, at least.
- 135, 11・12, 1052, 985, Dec. 2022
- 135, 9・10, 914, 850, Oct. 2022
- 135, 7・8, 808, 741, Aug. 2022
- 11, 51, 67, May 2022
- 10, 271, 288, May 2022
- 138, 5, 1025, 1067, May 2021
- 96, 5, 133, 148, May 2020
- Systematizing Ronald Dworkin's Methodology of Interpretation, 132, 11, 1049, 1118, Dec. 2019
- Two Skepticisms and Dworkinian Methodology of Interpretation, 小川 亮, Law and philosophy, 5, 63, 114, Jun. 2019, 信山社
- 95, 1, 121, 136, Jan. 2019
- Notes on Civil Cases of the Supreme Court (Vol. 69, No.2), OGAWA Ryo, 法学協会雑誌 = Journal of the Jurisprudence Association, 134, 9, 1808, 1850, Sep. 2017, 東京大学大学院法学政治学研究科
Misc
- Japan, Ayako Hatano, Kayoko Ishihara, Masahiko Kinoshita, Ryo Ogawa, Mayu Terada, Professor, Kento Yamamoto, Tomoshi Yoshikawa,, 2022 Global Review of Constitutional Law, 206, 210, Oct. 2023
- 36, Jun. 2022
- 135, 3・4, 232, 235, May 2022
講演・発表
- 29 Feb. 2024
- 18 Feb. 2024
- 07 Oct. 2023
- 14 Jul. 2023
- 20 Mar. 2023
- 01 Oct. 2022
- 27 Sep. 2022
- 14 Jun. 2022
- 26 May 2022
- 18 Mar. 2022
- 08 Mar. 2022
- 22 Feb. 2022
- 22 Dec. 2021
- 27 Nov. 2021
- 19 Jun. 2021
- 07 May 2021
- 23 Oct. 2020
- 31 Jul. 2020
- 15 Mar. 2020
- 05 Jan. 2020
- 07 Aug. 2019
- A Dworkinian Response to the Debunking Argument, OGAWA Ryo, IVR2019, 12 Jun. 2019
- 01 Jul. 2018
- 14 Apr. 2018
受賞
競争的資金
- 22K13280, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists, Standards of Judicial review on administrative action
- 21K20081, 2021, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research Grant-in-Aid for Research Activity Start-up
- 22K13280
- 21K20081, The methodology of the study of law, This study was conducted with the aim of establishing a methodology of jurisprudence. This research enabled us to form a study group on legal methodology, and we continue to deepen our research through reports from members or outside experts. In terms of specific research results, the goals of jurisprudence have been clarified using insights from metaethics and philosophy of science, and it has been shown that "inference to the best explanation" can legitimately be used as a general basis for jurisprudential methodology. We plan to continue our research on this topic in the future.